Section 17 (8) of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963, and the payment of rent for the tenants deferred, did not comply with the rent controller's order to collect rent for certain months. In essence, the tenant controller was obliged to implement it unless the tenant could convince him that the default was not intentional but for reasons beyond its control or unavoidable. There were situations. The tenant never claimed that the landlord received the rent for months specific against the tenant, and there can be no legal justification for the tenant being appointed before the tenant. The rental controller failed to submit a request, but failed to submit a request to the rental controller for any reason for not submitting the rent arrears. As a result, the Kent controller had to defend the tenant's appeal, excluding the worm without any merit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
