Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus GHAZANFAR AHMAD BAJWA


A. VII, R 11 (b) and (c) Section 107 (2) of the Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), Section 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the appeal dismissed due to lack of court fees. do. At least one person did not allow a good reduction in court fees for the appellants; the appellant should have been consciously aware of the decree for the specific amount allowed against them, the court A fee memorandum should be filed with this fee to meet the decision amount. Yet according to PLD 1984 SC 289, in the case of Siddique Khan, the Supreme Court ruled, the appellate court should have allowed at least one opportunity to appease the appellant, the appellant should have Was not entitled to provide such opportunities. The remand of his appeal was set aside to grant the High Court verdict an opportunity, the appeals court remanded to deal with court fees, according to the Supreme Court decision, P.L. in accordance

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Nooriabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.