PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus GHAZANFAR AHMAD BAJWA
A. VII, R 11 (b) and (c) Section 107 (2) of the Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), Section 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the appeal dismissed due to lack of court fees. do. At least one person did not allow a good reduction in court fees for the appellants; the appellant should have been consciously aware of the decree for the specific amount allowed against them, the court A fee memorandum should be filed with this fee to meet the decision amount. Yet according to PLD 1984 SC 289, in the case of Siddique Khan, the Supreme Court ruled, the appellate court should have allowed at least one opportunity to appease the appellant, the appellant should have Was not entitled to provide such opportunities. The remand of his appeal was set aside to grant the High Court verdict an opportunity, the appeals court remanded to deal with court fees, according to the Supreme Court decision, P.L. in accordance
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Nooriabad lawyer