Find a Lawyer

UMAR versus STATE

Section 302 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13E witnesses who were otherwise close relatives of the deceased, were also in a very close relationship with the deceased despite being witnesses on the occasion. There was no doubt that he was in the house. At the time of the incident but mere presence in the house was not enough to believe that he had actually witnessed the incident. The victim's wife not only heard the story from other eye witnesses, but also with medical evidence. Was controversial, the result was extremely dangerous. Relying on such evidence based on the conviction of the accused does not prove satisfactory for the accused in the instance of the accused, in addition to the fact that the witness who worked as a gun recovery adviser There was a nephew, his evidence was undoubtedly revealing the place where the gun was kept in joint possession of the accused and the co-accused, the shooting was also attributed to the co-accused, I cannot say that the suspect. Special possession of guns Recovery of empty cartridges from Word is also suspicious The evidence for this purpose was contradictory and since the purpose Acting without effect is in a sense without cause, the absence of evidence can be a cause of instability against them, which is not free from the penalty of doubt against which it has been set aside by the High Court. done. immigration advocates phone number from Abbaspur lawyer