QAMAR SULTAN versus LOFRIN BEGUM
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) In the Dover house, a fourth part of the landlord transferred the property to his daughter's daughter-in-law in return for his doer, which proved unsuccessful in return for marriage. The case was ordered to protect his interest in the suit and it was stated that the decision was upheld in the appeal and no further action was decided and the matter was settled there, the applicant's mother. 'S mother subsequently filed a lawsuit declaring ownership of the occupant of the house. In return for the pressure, almost half a century ago, her husband moved the property under her husband's behalf, the appellant's case was dismissed while the appellant's appeal was to examine the effect. Was granted even though the appellant could have been the husband and son. In other cases there was nothing in the record to deal with his property to show that the appellant had been acquitted by his conduct and thus could have been bound by it. In addition, there is also the question that if the appellant's husband and son were living in the same house which was the subject of the transfer, then what further evidence could she have provided in support of her claim that she was the owner? In addition to producing a certified copy of its name implementation and registered cabin name work,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Shahkot lawyer