Find a Lawyer

ILAM DIN versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

Property Act 1882 Section 118 West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 [MLR64], Para 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Land exchanges were occupied by the parties and the mutation was adopted. One of these changes came in the wake of the West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation 1959 and the cancellation of the other because it was also targeted because of the supply of the West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation 1959, exchanged. The cancellation was challenged by the defendants in the appeal and order. The cancellation was called back in connection with the exchange that was passed in favor of it. Such an order was upheld by the Board of Revenue High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction, following the same new decision to the Board of Revenue. The matter was remanded, the Board of Revenue once again dismissed the review. The court dismissed the constitutional request that the High Court Circle had finalized, that the Board of Revenue had erred in not keeping both parties on the same ground when the mutation was found to be wrong as a violation of the MLR. If so, there should have been a proper 64 Board of Revenue course. Erase them and restore the parties to their original state. It was inappropriate to dispose of the interchange change on the respondents' appeal, since the cancellation of such a change would have caused the defendant to own the land in both places; And the Revenue Authorities' controversial orders were illegally depriving the applicants of the land they were granted leave to consider. property advocate from Lodhran lawyer