Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ SAHI versus THE STATE

The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the first part of the incident of receiving Rs 3000 in the police by section 161 was proved by the prosecution witnesses who had no ill will or intention. Was. Due to the false involvement of the rivalry taken by the accused, the presence of the police station was not proved at the relevant time. In the presence of two judicial officers, the raid was recovered from the seven accused during the raid. His statements were corroborated by other witnesses of the prosecution at the time of the raid, the accused could not explain his occupation of the same number of currency notes to the accused, which was earlier noted by the magistrate prosecution, proved his case against the accused. done. Doubt was maintained list of supreme court advocates from Mir Ali lawyer