ABDUL AZIZ versus SHAHAB DIN
The vacated property and homelessness laws (repealed) Act 1975 section 2 constitution of Pakistan (1973), in the jurisdiction of the Art 185 Notification Officer, allotted land in the interest of the foregoing, which was partially reduced by the Authority on review. The Land Notification Officer restored the appellant's / foreclosure prediction in the constitutional jurisdiction, responding to the orders of the respondents finally purchased, the authority to deal with the leave to appeal the notification officer's order in the constitutional jurisdiction. Is fully reflected under which the appellants were part of the allotment. During twenty years it was implemented without any objections from any constituency. The law did not authorize the notified authority to exercise jurisdiction over such order, and in this way the notified officer had jurisdiction over the pending cases and their case was not pending on remand. Prior to any settlement authority when vacant rules were repealed, notified officer has been remanded by any other competent authority, without the jurisdiction to settle the decision on the order of the Settlement Authority. That is why the High Court's decision unreasonable appeal was dismissed by the notification officer's order. Under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Makli lawyer