ABDUL MATLOOB KHAN versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, PUNJAB
Profit was reported in the report of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Annual Secret Report, while comparing the performance of public servants with other officers, it was rated lower than average. The first counseling officer considered the performance of a public servant to be fairly fair and equal. The second counseling officer of an average officer, however, agreed with the reporting officer because of the observations of another counseling officer, the remarks recorded by the reporting officer were conveyed to the applicant that the performance of the public employee on average was sed. Has been rated In Part IIH III of the report, the ACR could not be described as below average, held. Such a dispute was unfounded, because, in Part III of the report, an officer's performance had to be compared to that of other officers, even though an officer could be described on average in Part II, his rating could decline. When it was compared to other officers of the same grade. In this way, the public servant did not request that the reporting officer or other counseling officer have any personal reason for making negative comments. This did not raise any question of law. For consideration in the application, the leave to appeal was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
