Find a Lawyer

KABIR AHMAD KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974 Section 4 (1), Proviso (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) seniority of the civil servant and consequently the rejection of the official employment by the public employment tribunal. His claim from the history of the government employees, accepting the claim of sanity, directed the government to consider the date of promotion of public employment from the date when a public servant was appointed to the position of high office immediately after his promotion. Government employees who were affected by the work were forced to serve by the orders or decision of any departmental authority. There are no individual which had risen before the appeal can be promoted to a higher level, because the development of the affected civil servant civil servant who was invalid argument was not considered for development. When young people were promoted on the basis that he was not senior to them, the promoter's case was not one where he checked his records and examined them. Promotion is likely to be ineligible and allowed to be rejected by its Juniors Service Tribunal, as the promotional civil servant's claim for sanity was accepted, and he was eligible to instruct that progress was made from the deadline. Therefore, his case must be considered in that direction. Prior to the declaration of senior employees to the Government, the service flew by the order of the service tribunal; Section 4 (1), the bar contained in the provisions (b) of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974, was not applicable as such. He was also appointed. The matter was not considered when the Act and Service Tribunal K.C. immigration advocates from Kahror Pacca lawyer