Find a Lawyer

ISRAR AHMAD KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P.

On the dismissal of the earlier representation against the negative comments of Article 4 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) of the Border Services Tribunals Act 1974, the applicant submitted another representation through review which was duly authorized by the Authority. Entertained by, but rejected. After the rejection of the second representation by the merit, the applicant filed an appeal before the Tribunal which was banned at the time of which the second representation was rejected on the merits and not on that basis. That he was not authorized It was appropriate, after dismissing the second representation, that someone was justified in filing an appeal, especially when the decision was properly presented to the tribunal at the hearing of the appeal, in accordance with the law in denial of discretion. The tribunal was not used. Finally, the appeal for leave of appeal was converted to appeal and the trial service tribunal was summoned on remand. best law firm from Fizagat lawyer