MEHRULLAH versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code = Sections 307 148 and 149 Evidence of the Secondary Evidence Investigation Officer's Non-Possession, Evidence From The Testimony Of The Prosecutors Revealed That This Occurred On Their (Complainant) Field While The Site Plan Was already showing that this had happened. On the way, the investigating officer, who was the necessary witness to indicate where the incident occurred by proving the site plan, was excluded from the list of witnesses and was not presented despite being available and instead inquired. Secondary evidence was filed by the trial court to prove the writing. The officers failed to meet the essential requirements of the law, before allowing the court to present, in writing, evidence to prove to the investigating officer, to dispel doubts about the existence of what is available. Should have appeared in court for.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Besham lawyer