Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FAZAL MUHAMAMD versus MUHAMAMD JAFAR


Rule Civil Code 1908 Section 115 Amendment Jurisdiction, the use of the concurrent results of the courts below on the question of fact, the court had a concrete and tangible reason in support of their conclusion by applying their conscious mind to the relevant evidence. Did not own property. The plaintiff in question failed to identify a misinterpretation of the material evidence. The court decisions below were not subjected to illegal matters or material irregularities raised by the plaintiff and failed to present a case for interference with the High Court's jurisdictional exercise. The decisions and orders of the courts below the review application were excluded in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.