ZAHID HUSSAIN versus STATE
Section 561A & 195 (l :) (c) Disclaimer Code (XLV of 1860), section 419/420/471/474/467/109 Copies of the only controversial document recognized in the exclusion of proceedings on section 195 (1) (C), cannot function as a bar as is the case with regard to the documents which have been presented or given in evidence and do not say whether a copy should be presented or evidence. Whether to grant in or not, the application under Section 1 561A, the CRYC, was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Kotli lawyer
