SARDARA versus MUHAMMAD HAYAT
Constitution Act of Pakistan Act of 1908 (1973), Article 185 (3) Appeal for obtaining certified copies before The Appellate Court was dismissed before the Appellate Court because of the ban on the High Court ban. Was that if the request for supply should be returned to the copying agency at ying B at which was returned, the copy was submitted to the copying agency at application S at, instead of submitting a new one. , Appeals are not time-barred and time spent obtaining certified copies is a waste of time in obtaining copies. Comes. Therefore, the limitation question against the applicants was decided only because they did not file the same application before the copy agency in the application S at the copy agency in B Was. \ But a fresh application of the High Court doctrine appears with the approval of a technical leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Taunsa sharif lawyer
