Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus TRUSTEES OF PORT OF KARACHI

Karachi Port Trust Act 1886 Section 23 (2) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 25A, 37 (3) and 38 (3a) of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 (2) of the employees of Karachi Termination of Services Port Trust Employees v Complaint Requests, the Labor Court argued, however, that despite the objection by the accuser of the lack of jurisdiction of the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction, the Labor Court's injunction Was ordered to be accepted as an unlawful and unlawful option, and thus prevented the pending action. The objection to the keeping of the Labor Court's appeals was that the original order for termination of the employees under section 23, Karachi Port Trust Act, 1886, appealed against the Single Judge's order before the Large Bench of the High Court. ? When employees filed their grievance petitions before the Labor Court, the proceedings were initiated, therefore, by ordering the termination of the employees' service, which gave rise to the filing of the grievance petitions, it was filed under section 3 ( 2) Under the section, can not be considered a "legal order", the Law Reform Ordinance Inter-Religious Order was approved by Labor. The court did not intend to abolish the proceedings before the Labor Court under Section 25A, Industrial Relations Ordinance, but only to resolve the interlocutory matter or any decision under Section 25A (4) of the dispute. Amount cannot be equal to ) Of the Appeal Ordinance Solution provided under section (37 (a)), the Industrial Relations Ordinance was thus not available against the provision of inter-sectional provisions of section 3 (2); the law reforms ordinance refers to an immigration advocate from Machi Goth lawyer