Find a Lawyer

ZUBAIDA MUMTAZ BEGUM versus IKRAM JAN

XLI, Rr 17 and 19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3), appealed to the original decree order of CPC CPC, 1973, Arts 185 (3), on the same day the application for reinstatement of the appeal was submitted the same day. Is the reason for the absence of an affidavit in the affidavit, the appeal was reinstated, the appeal was dismissed The petitioner's position was that there was no evidence before the appellate court, on the basis of which he could take the stand. That the presence of his party or the absence of his lawyer when the appeal was sought for a hearing was irrelevant and that the lawyer in support of the request for rehabilitation If the affidavit submitted cannot be accepted as evidence, there is no reason why the appellate court could not hold the affidavit filed by the present defendant's lawyer. In which he cited the reasons for his absence from the court when an appeal was sought for the hearing, although one of the defendants' ID magazines filed the affidavit preferentially presented by the appellate court officials. Was required to comply with the affidavit, especially when a reinstatement petition was submitted the same day the appeal was dismissed. divorce advocates from Chowk Maitla lawyer