Find a Lawyer

GHULAM DIN versus SAIFULLAH

Land displacement Act 1958 Section 10 Rehabilitation and Settlement Scheme 1956, Para 68 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the underground land allotment were initially proposed in favor of the respondents. But ultimately it was proposed in favor of the constitutional jurisdiction, certifying the applicants and the High Court, finding that under Article 68 Re, the Rehabilitation and Settlement Scheme, it is the responsibility of the Settlement Authority to approve the proposal. Who has been in favor of the respondents for several years and thus the defendants accepted leave of appeal for the applicants. In the context of the tention that the defendants moved their claim and the allotment has been found where, before the High Court Settlement Authority, in fact, no petition was filed against the applicants against it, Therefore, creating a realistic conflict cannot be allowed. For the proposal, which was decided and buried long before the High Court's view, a number of respondents in the Respondents had been displeased earlier and needed to be certified under the law, was correct and in accordance with the law. The leave was denied divorce advocates from Jehangira lawyer