Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE--1007

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Employees were charged with dismissal from employment The notice and hearing was given to the public servant because of the short notice procedure due to the employees and after considering the defense. Government employees were fined a hefty fine. Prior to the Department of Appeal's failure to appeal the service tribunal's appeal, it was disputed that the facts alleged against public servants were contradictory, allegations should have been formally investigated and summary proceedings in the case authorized. Should not have been done. A criminal case was also registered on the same facts, and on the conclusion of the case of the public servant, the dismissal of the job which was based on the same facts should have been kept aside, the public servant should have gone through it. Even better than what he was arrested on Monday, so his brief inquiry can be resorted to: Inspector General of Police v. Anisur Rahman Khan PLD 1985 SC 134 In the charges against a civil servant, Violating the law, including the more serious charge of helping, which was kept in court custody and Verse was not the case. With the criminal offense under the Prohibition Act, so far no response has been made in its favor as far as departmental proceedings are concerned, no case against the major expulsion conviction has been reached, on leave of appeal. Declined best law firm from Sibi lawyer