ABDUL KAREEM KHAN versus HAROON-UR-RASHEED TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LTD.
Applicants exchanging counterfeit transfer proceedings of shares of Sections 9 and 265 of the company have charged the transfer of their shares in the name of other persons. Es necessary documents to support the parties' respective claims were not available on the record-keeping regulator, its counter affidavit was silently resolved in the company's affairs during the relevant period when the applicant's shares were transferred. I was told In favor of the parties' interest, the High Court upheld the application under section 95 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984, because under section 265 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984, the demand for an inquiry from the company, the law in the application The mention of the wrong provisions of the court could not stop the court. Using its proper authority and appropriate jurisdiction, Dior La High Court directed the Security and Exchange Commission of Pakistan to appoint an inspector to investigate the affairs of the company and also disposed of a request for an inquiry into the authenticity of the transfer of shares. Given \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
