MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 1212 (3) After the termination of post civil servants, the constitutional petition against the removal of the post was rejected by the High Court, observing that the government refused to grant the petitioner to establish its rights. To refer to the service tribunal so that the question raised in the leave application was to appeal that the authority's process in the termination of this position was so deliberately to deprive the public servant of his position, values, and status. Thus, it was a case pending by the High Court in the jurisdiction of the Constitution and not one of which This service can be placed with the service tribunal, the applicant may ask for relief regarding the terms and conditions of employment. The termination of this position may be in the special capacity of a particular authority but if it is to be obtained by a device Is used for Not permitted by law, then it was a violation of the terms and conditions of the Employment Service Tribunal, excluding ive jurisdiction to deal with the terms and conditions and where a claim for relief by a public servant regarding the terms and conditions of the employees. Been done, there was a service tribunal and not a high court forum to examine it
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Shadiwal lawyer