DILAWAR HUSSAIN SHAH versus MAQBOOL HUSSAIN SHAH
West Pakistan Stability Holding Ordinance 1960 Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Applicants for the stabilization proceedings preferred the appeal against the dissatisfaction with the stability scheme but to no effect Due to periodic amendment of the petition the results were not obtained. The constitutional petitioner was challenged in the constitutional petition which dismissed the applicant's request for leave to appeal that the applicant had orchards on the land and the land was of good quality but it was wrongly done. One such aspect was given to the other owners by the High Court orchard to appear properly for the case. There was no mention in the Board of Revenue's search of the record that the applicant was not treated unfairly. He was given the land according to his entitlement and in fact more than he was entitled to, the share of the applicants was kept in possession when the joint case was divided and it was heard at the appeal stage even though on appeal. Was banned, delayed thereafter, the matter of apology was not conducive to the sanction of such leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Khanewal lawyer