Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ AHMAD CHEEMA versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 212 (3) and 199 Government employees' 25-year service-related retirement service tribunal's appeal of a public servant was dismissed by a government employee claiming to file an appeal to the Supreme Court for leave, but his According to the KG allegation, it was not pleasing because of the bar imposed under the Temporary Constitution Order 1981, after the government employees lifted the martial law, filed a constitutional petition in the High Court and began the second round, which was dismissed. had gone. The argument was that the order passed by the retiring authority of a government employee was an illegal act because it was approved by an officer who passed such an order. Was unable to do. Held: Ground was raised by the applicant so as to be unable to pass the authority's order. Retirement was also available to the applicant within the scope of the Provisional Constitution Order 1981, as such a case service for the completion of twenty-five years and to assume an authorized jurisdiction through the service and to deal with the officer under those powers. Should have been raised before the tribunal and brought to the Supreme Court under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution for not doing so. , The Inter-Provincial Decision of the Service Tribunal terminated the restoration of proceedings in the constitutional jurisdiction or refused leave of appeal if no case was presented. inheritance advocates near Tarbela lawyer