Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR, DEPUTY DIRECTOR

In the conclusion of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Annual Secret Report, the offending remarks were rejected by the appellate authority representing the civil servant, he appealed before the service tribunal beyond the legal period, and submitted that he be employed. Has been removed. , A separate order in various operations, and he kept himself against the order of removal. Having been set aside only, he approached the Tribunal in the matter of negative remarks and the Tribunal considered the explanation satisfactory, and the dismissal of the appeal on the part of the public servant's appeal was in fact time-barred and presented. The explanation given was unsatisfactory when the civil servant was actively challenging the employee's removal from the job, and at the same time, he should continue his treatment against his negative remarks, the service tribunal thought through his operative order. The facts of the case were justified and there was no question of a law of public importance. , The leave to appeal was denied jobs for advocates from Kot Addu lawyer