KARIN SCHEPPEI versus STATE
The Customs Act 1969 section 156 (1) (8) evidence, a definition of the defendant was caught at the airport after carrying 1 kg of commercial heroin powder hidden in a scab of wood drawn on a carom board. Recovery counselors denied the truth The confiscating officer was an independent and impartial witness who had no enmity against the accused who was a stranger to him, falsely implicating Reliance on the sole testimony of the seasoning officer. No motive, the trial court rightly accused the dismissal of the advisers. By no means can the prosecution's version discredit the testimony of an officer to arrest that smuggling of heroin through a network of highly skilled and ingenious criminals pervades the whole world, Didn't even deserve to be cleansed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Manga Mandi lawyer
