MAHMOOD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BAHAWALPUR
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The tenant applicant claims to be the owner by denying the landlord and the tenant relationship, the rent controller applied. They were allowed to evacuate and maintain their expulsion order. In the constitutional petition, the title of the respondents to appeal the documentary evidence on record in the constitutional petition filed by the applicant proved that the seller was a buyer through the registered process. Source title of the property. The site plan approved by the authority was approved, and then it was constructed by a covered petitioner, who claimed to be the owner and denied the ownership of the respondents from which no documentary evidence came to light. It appears that he was the owner of the premises. The applicant in question admitted to having vacant property and that it had not yet been settled. That it paid no rent to the settlement or paid the property tax or security for the electricity connection. The applicant also failed to prove the sanction and approval obtained for the construction of the premises, thus proving the relationship of the landlord and the tenant and this is a fact which is a fact. The following courts had jointly ruled in favor of the respondents; their constitutional jurisdiction was not properly interfered with by the High Court but the leave to appeal was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
