CHAIRMAN P.I.A.C versus NASEEM MALIK
Section 10 (2) (3) (4) [as encompassing Pakistan International Airlines Corporation (Amendment) Ordinance (LIII of 1984]] - Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) ??? The Tribunal ruled that the employee's resignation was obtained under strict and repressive conduct and thus had no legal effect, and the orders passed were invalid and consequently the benefits. There was also an order to reinstate the employee, considering that the service services were terminated on 15? 7 1984, reached by letter of 6 8 8, 1984, the service tribunal had no scope in this matter. Option And because the provisions of section 10 (2) (3) (4) did not have the same effect as the [Amendment] of the [International Airlines Corporation Act 1956]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Taxila lawyer
