AHMAD HUSSAIN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) The claim of seniority, applicant's claim was that since he was the most responsible senior, he should have been with the former influence by promotion to this position. The petition was rejected by the department. In addition to the authority to appeal through the service tribunal leave, the government had the right to develop a suitable job at a suitable job at the appropriate time and since the service rules cover the positions of governors, lecturers and principals of medical colleges. In which the category belongs to the applicant. 1984 1984 1984, the applicant could not be promoted to the position of claimant prior to the date under which the applicant's representation was implemented and promulgated by the Government in 1986, In the absence of, applicants could have no objection to the government's action in not offering it. Any allegations of misconduct, in which the petition was not excluded from the merit, were dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Shangla lawyer