Find a Lawyer

HAFEEZ-UD-DIN versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Retired government employee from medical ground was suffering from mental illness and was sent to a number of specialists for treatment The Medical Board finally voted that a government employee be able to remain in service. No government employee was retired. On the basis of such opinion, the leave of appeal of the public servant before the dismissal of the service employee's request was that of the public servant, the psychologist whose opinion was presented to the medical board started dealing with the civil servant. And all subsequent certificates were indicated. Because he was responding to treatment and improving, so the order of retirement was not guaranteed by law. The question is whether a public servant is fit enough to stay in the service, which was a question that was thoroughly considered by the Medical Service Tribunal members. The board had no personal purpose against the public servant to make a false recommendation, and sought to provide the best available treatment treatment to the public servant, if this were not the case when the employer intended to discontinue the employee. If so, the fact is, there was not a reasonable question which allowed the Supreme Court to appeal the inquiry. Refused best law firm from Fizagat lawyer