Find a Lawyer

SHAHNAZ SEHGAL versus FATIMA ASHRAF

Article XXVI's Supreme Court Rules OXXVI, R1 Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance (XVit of 1979), Article 16, reviewed the judgment of the Supreme Court that the applicant was a sub-tenant of the land and with his written permission and Sub-tenancy was created with such a fact. The applicant proved from some of the documents presented in support of the petitioner, however, failed to cite any document from the record at the time of the order under review, in support of the claim that the applicant was all rent in this case. Was proven Applicants sought to rely on some of the documents produced in the revision request paper book, despite the observations made in the judgment under review, with some part of the property in their possession with consent. Was not included in the book. The appeal under consideration, though, was in the knowledge of the applicant and could easily have been included in the paper book or application for his inclusion. During the appeal hearing, the record has been prepared that no error can be seen on the face of the record as the request for review of the decision has been identified but the request for review of the decision cannot be successful. immigration advocate from Jehangira lawyer