Sections 227, 228, 229, 231 and 265F Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324 and 34 of the Qutl-Um, attempt to compel Qutel-Om, to alter the charge of joint intent and to prosecute witnesses in addition to the charge. The request for a cross-examination to be recalled, and the request of the complainant and the defendant charged with changing the civil surgeon, was requested under section 231, CCPC, which required the prosecution's witnesses There was a request to be called back who has already done cross inspection. Such plea of the defendants was dismissed with further prayer for a civil surgeon to present a medical board record, as the amended charge included not only the law departments, but also one person Was accused of injuring. The person, whose name was not previously alleged, even if the court did not resort to the provisions of section 228, 229, CR PC, was still not justified in rejecting the trial court's defense request. That she'd already double-check them. Inspected by witnesses. Which re-examination shall be made in respect of such alteration / enhancement as the defendant has in respect of a request to seek a civil surgeon, the defense within the meaning of section 265F, CR PC at the end of the trial, There will be full opportunity to request that the court not resort to the previous provisions of Sections 228, 229, CCPC, to ask the accused and the prosecutor to re-examine the witnesses, to seek re-examination. The opportunity to move the application was not allowed, so that the accused or the prosecutor may request
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
