Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ISHTIAQ versus PRINCE GLASS WORKS LTD


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199, Constitutional Jurisdiction, Holding the High Court's Use of Limitations in a Constitution Petition, could not exercise the powers that could be exercised by the appellate court, correcting the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. Can be requested for The party had to prove, on the basis of the facts admitted, that the finding of the challenged tribunal in the constitutional petition was without evidence, or, not to consider material evidence or to consider irrefutable evidence. That the Tribunal exercised jurisdiction over or with respect to it. The argument that corruption or unlawful instability causes dissent, which is different from the tribunal's view, can be taken on the available evidence on record, that the Constitutional jurisdiction cannot be exercised by the High Court.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Chacklala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.