MUHAMMAD ISHTIAQ versus PRINCE GLASS WORKS LTD
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199, Constitutional Jurisdiction, Holding the High Court's Use of Limitations in a Constitution Petition, could not exercise the powers that could be exercised by the appellate court, correcting the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. Can be requested for The party had to prove, on the basis of the facts admitted, that the finding of the challenged tribunal in the constitutional petition was without evidence, or, not to consider material evidence or to consider irrefutable evidence. That the Tribunal exercised jurisdiction over or with respect to it. The argument that corruption or unlawful instability causes dissent, which is different from the tribunal's view, can be taken on the available evidence on record, that the Constitutional jurisdiction cannot be exercised by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Chacklala lawyer