PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD
Categories dealing with the import category by the applicants under the Customs Act Air Conditioning System Order No. 39/66 under the Customs Act 1969 Section 32 of the Order Order 39/66 Article 5 7 1968 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Section 199 Notice Section 32 I come No charge was made by the Department of Customs against the applicant regarding the receipt of the shipment without payment of the customs duty and any fraud, misrepresentation or false declaration and on behalf of the customs authorities Orders approved from indicate that this is a case of mistake or ignorance. The notice of customs authority was issued after the expiry of four months. The customs authorities set out under section 32 (3) of the Customs Act were unable to put forward any argument in support of the verification of the showcase notice. The notice was dismissed. There was no legal effect. Was not forthcoming and as a result all orders were subsequently approved, they were also declared without any law or authority \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from North Wazirstan lawyer