Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR BEG versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Easements Act 1882 Sections 12 and 15 readily the two courts simultaneously found that there was no first evidence to maintain the applicant's position that he or she had obtained the right through a prescription on the disputed land. That this is a private passage the applicant did not have. It was stated that since the fact that he or his predecessor allegedly used the so-called passage, holding such fact alone, the applicant did not fit his claim of ease. immigration advocate from Garh Maharaja lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes