PANDHI KHAN versus BOARD OF REVENUE, HYDERABAD
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The applicant obtained the highest bid through public auction; the auction on eight survey numbers was confirmed by the competent authority in the name of the applicant, part of the payment was also made by him. Was presented and the petitioner was also issued a petition to him. The bid, after almost two years, was confirmed for the reasons that the defendant filed an application claiming three survey numbers as the unconfirmed confirmation of the applicant's non-bid was confirmed. The applicants were agreed to exclude three contentious surveys. In the case of numbers, the respondent has been remanded to hear the question whether a decision order can be withdrawn in relation to the survey numbers remaining except for three survey numbers. \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Talagang lawyer
