Find a Lawyer

SHAH DIN versus DISTRICT MANAGER, P.R.T.C.

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 In the Constitutional Jurisdiction, the Constitution of the High Court does not usually interfere with the finding of the facts listed by the Special Tribunals, but such rule Does not apply where such a tribunal was encountered. The High Court overlooked the material circumstances in recording its findings that the Labor Forum had completely failed the testimony of inspectors appointed by the employer corporation to monitor the performance of the employees and that the applicants were keeping in view the matter. Was instructed to restore. What did not affect them was that they would be removed from the charges against them. The employer's supervisory staff, during their assignment, found that the employees had committed misconduct by not issuing tickets to the passengers, who ordered their rehabilitation, who had paid their rent labor forum, The CIT ignored the supervisory staff confronting employees on the spot who were found unpaid and the employees were unable to confirm their claim that they had paid their rent. Interference with labor appellate orders was justified. Petitions were dismissed from the court for leave to appeal famous supreme court advocate from Shahdad Kot lawyer