GHULAM AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Section 2 (2) Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), Constitution of Section 10 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the respondents of every civil court order Comes in ownership. Prior to the independence of the country, the petitioner's petition, despite the fact that the disputed property was not in the pool of compensation, was allotted to itself, the respondents successfully challenged the order of allotment in the constitutional petition, in which it It was believed that since the property had not been vacated, it was not appropriate for the matter to be transferred or transferred by the default administration, an important point was that the property was released before the independence under the judgment and decree of the Civil Court. Was held by a Muslim, it was not an empty property, and was not found on the records of the authorities. As such, such property cannot be included in the auction list nor can it be sold behind the far left. Because of this, the property auction was absolutely invalid, and the auction buyer could not have waived such auction from the High Court in favor of the auctioneer as the matter was fully dealt with. And his decision was right, no right. The above order refused to justify interference
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Rajanpur lawyer