Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus WAJID ALI BURKI

And XVII, R 2, OIX, R 6 (1) (a), O VIII, R 10 & ON ??? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3)? Under OXVII, R 2, CPC where the suit was adjourned any day, the parties or any of them failed to appear, so the court could remove the suit in any of the ways it was instructed. Can process Create another order via OIX, CPC or as it thinks fit. Once the case has been adjourned? The applicant's alleged representative's request, the only way for the court to open the OIX, was to comply with the CPC, which was not done. O IX, R 6 (1) (a), the delivery of the CPC was grounded in the facts of the case as it was stated that the date set forth in the summons for the trial applies only when the defendant issued In response to the summons submitted. Also, the delivery of R-10 and OVIII, R-10 under the CPC was not applicable on this matter as the court did not specifically instruct to hear the written statements. us immigration advocates from Tarbela lawyer