MUHAMMAD LATIF BHATTI versus CHAIRMAN, AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD (E), WAPDA, GUJRANWALA
Services from the Tribunals Act 1973 Sections 3 and 4 of the Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Employees (Capacity and Seizure) Rules, 1978, R11 WAPDA, from the Department of Appeals Treatment Appellant to the Department of Service, Section 25A, Industrial Relations. Appeal Ordinance, 1969, Appellant goes to Labor Court on removal from employment when no response from his department was received, Labor Court ordered High Court to revive it on writ petition filed by Appeal Was the winner. For the purpose of the Service Tribunals Act, a civil servant and the Labor Court had no jurisdiction in this matter, then proceeded to the Appellate Service Tribunal but excluded the appellant's appeal for legal necessity without taking advantage of departmental remedies. Because the service tribunal upheld the issue. It was necessary to take advantage of the departmental appeal before going to the service tribunal, the appeal was correct The service tribunal dismissed the ly and the service of the complaint notice under section 25A, the appeal of the Department of Industrial Relations Ordinance is not paid.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
