Find a Lawyer

AIJAZ HUSSAIN SHAH versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, SINDH, HYDERABAD

Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 barrage land, was made in favor of the applicant to obtain the consent of the grant of land in the village 20 chains, the petitioner's argument was that the villagers had obtained the consent of the villagers. All formal operations for have been completed. And finally after paying the installments, the land was given to the applicant and after interacting with the director, settlement / authority staff, the defendant reviewed the land and prepared fake measurements and sketches where the application was made. Land under the influence of the lenders was severely affected by Barrage Mukhtarkar. Such disputes of the applicants were not supported by the Director, Settlement and other top officials, the land given to the applicants came in 20 chains of the concerned village but the consent of the villagers could not be obtained and in this case it was It was also reported that the land was also cultivated in the dispute and such search was not challenged. The matter was sent to the relevant authorities to determine if the applicant was in the twenty chains of the village. The ground has fallen along the direction that the area that falls within 20 chains will be excluded from the grant. If the consent of the villagers is not taken. patent advocate from Chaghi lawyer