Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RABBANI versus DEPUTY REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVE

As a member of the Operative Society Act 1925 sections 54 and 56 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Respondent, a plot was allotted by the Society which cleared the respondent's allotment or allotment by notice under the postal certificate. To demand. The respondent canceled the plot in his name, however, failed to clear the dues and his allotment was canceled and the plot was re-allotted to another person and the applicant was registered with him through a registered sale deed. Bought the plot, the building plan was approved and no objection certificate was obtained from the respondents of the society, however, the plot was forcibly seized and filed under section 54 of the Act to claim the title of the plot, The Registrar appointed a nominee, who presented his award after recording the evidence and hearing the parties. It was held. That the Society failed to prove that actually the respondents were given notice but at the same time it was held that the applicant was very passionate. The Plot In Good Emans Award also stated that the Society was given the Respondents. Alternative plots should be allotted and the applicant is allowed to retain the plot. The Registrar said that the award was also given by the Registrar who also recorded the nominated order and award of the Registrar without record. The applicant was not a buyer with good faith; in the absence of such a finding, the Registrar could not hold the award of his nominees to the Registrar, thus he was declared without legal authority and the matter was settled. immigration advocate from Jehanian lawyer