GUL HASSAN versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, RAILWAYS
Article 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Removal of the Complaint Request Acceptance of the Benefits of Return of the Applicant The plaintiff stated in his affidavit that he has since been removed from the job, and such a factual The status was not. Although the benefit of the disputed return by the respondents was arbitrary, the plaintiffs' right to apply at the trial court was not at the discretion and liking of the individual, but through the discretion of the Labor Court and the Labor Appellate Tribunal. High Court refuses to give applicant back benefits in constitutional jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Chowk Maitla lawyer