Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD HUSSAIN BOKHARI versus BASHIR AHMAD

CPC Appeals O XL1, R 27 Additional Evidence from the CLC Code of Conduct Order Preparation of Defendants, Against the Appeal of the Ex-Parte Instead of Appealing to the Trial Court The decision was made and the order passed against them was filed directly in the appeal alleging that the defendants / appellants were not properly served or they were still sued. No Report To satisfy the plaintiff's / appellant's allegations, petition for appellate court to produce additional evidence We file. To prove that the defendants are fully aware of the trial against them, the appellate courts apply the facts of the case without any judicial mind, the application for additional evidence is dismissed on the basis that it appears It has not been decided on which case the applicant wants to present additional evidence and no such petition has been before the trial court, although the suit is pending before the trial court for such consideration before the trial court. There is no opportunity to plead that the defendants were not served or that they were not served He had no knowledge of prosecuting, for the first time he was brought before the Appellate Court Ground on which the application was made to apply. Additional evidence was rejected, there was no reason why the application could be denied, held, it was based on a false view of the matter and was not sustainable in law. law websites from Sajawal lawyer