Find a Lawyer

MIAN ABDUL MAJID versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Section 7 Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Regulations of Services) Rules, 1974, R 3 Seniority Respondent Claims Sovereignty on Appellant Based on Past Service Respondents Initial Recruitment After Being Selected by the Public Service Commission Appointed Assistant Engineer, C&W3 Apartment. And the appellant was not eligible to avail of past services to claim sanity and his appointment was not in continuation of his previous services to the NAPDA respondents, unless otherwise employed by the Government. Rather, the WAPDA employee, who was a law firm when the seniority list was issued, both the defendant and the appellant were acting as executive engineers and no one was exempt from this and after 15 years of their joining service. On leaving, the respondents waived the representation of the respondents for the count of respondents. The previous service was rejected as 1975 due to their failure to challenge the previous seniority list respondents, it was stopped by its own condo CT to re-examine the case it had previously closed. And was off solicitors from Mir Ali lawyer