FATIMA EXPORT CORPORATION versus HABIB BANK LTD
The Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 (Article 185), Article 185 (3) of the Limitation Act, the first appeal before the High Court against the decree of the previous party, which has no basis for the expiry of the period exceeded, justifies the basis for delay. The statement of the affidavit and the dates of the unidentified order will make it very clear that the relevant period cannot be claimed under section 14, irrespective of whether the defendant's lawyer was negligent or right or wrong. If it is assumed to be advisable. That is, the applicant had given wrong advice to the applicant, so this fact would not be an apology, as it would not have been possible for the defendant to behave himself in addition to his counsel's advice otherwise it would have been delayed. Was expressed. Angle's request did not have the strength to refuse to leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Gawadar lawyer