Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SH. ABDUL RAZZAQ versus CHAIRMAN, TOWN COMMITTEE, KABIRWALA


The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 14 was passed in the Civil Court, dismissing the Appellant, despite knowing full well that the Labor Laws apply to his case, in the Labor Court. Was and is within the ordinary jurisdiction of the civil court. It was banned, instead of sending a notice of complaint to its employer, a direct civil suit was brought against the dismissal of his job that the appellant argued was spent in civil court. The time to depart should have been excluded, it was rejected in view of the fact that despite knowing that labor laws were enforceable, it cannot be said of the appellant that he had brought a civil suit and It has been prosecuted with due diligence and good faith. The prerequisites `due diligence 'and` good faith app' were not met by the appellant, Section 14 of the Lamification Act would not be helpful. To him

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Hattian lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.