Find a Lawyer

LAIQ SHAH versus STATE

The definition of Sections 2302/99 and ???ation CO testimonies cannot be interpreted in any way by a confession made by any of the defendants involved in the CO indication because it is a felony conviction when the maker has ever committed the crime itself. Was not involved in any way, almost before the recording of the confession, almost live life of the crime was in the custody of the police and it is likely that under the strictness or repression, the confession was also taken from the other verbal. The evidence of the unforgivable character was not present on his own exhibit at the time of the incident and he has filed an FIR Did charged on the accused nor the witnesses in the presence of Eve. Witnesses at the time of the incident had pressed the wounds of the arm in the hands of one of the accused, who in fact made a serious accusation of his truth. His trial was denied before the trial. The DI witness was not found to be the case in which the trial version was given prosecution, failing to establish a case against the accused, who was suspected. Going beyond the shadow of doubt. law websites from Yazman Mandi lawyer