MANAGING DIRECTOR, LYALLPUR COTTON MILLS, FAISALABAD versus LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (PUNJAB), LAHORE
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 14 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XXIII, R 2 The petition was withdrawn by the solicitor and the second complaint was withdrawn from the previous application. The discontinuance effect filed two days after section 14, the Limitation Act's limitation provisions did not apply because the employee was not conducting his trial in a wrong forum. But the forum was correct The courts below failed to define the period for which the first application could not be pending, the section 14, the Limitation Act, 1908 required to restrict the provisions of the complaint, therefore The second complaint request was, therefore, filed outside the time limit and was not retained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Darya Khan lawyer