ALLAH BACHAY versus THE STATE
Sections 292/353, 186/225 and 506 Motion Picture Ordinance (XLIII of 1979), Section 18 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 498 Pre-arrest Guarantee, Police Officer Grant on which the accused applicant and the case against him. Was listed. The 13 co-accused were not authorized by the board or the licensing authority to file a complaint that 13 people were detained while watching an Indian movie on TV / VCR, hence, quite illegitimate and without authority. The petitioner and his 13 co-accused were in their favor. Resisting within the bounds of the law to release them from the illegal arrest of the police and in doing so, they did not exhibit or show a foreign / objectionable film in violation of the restrictions imposed by the Ordinance 1979, Although it is a crime, under Section 18 of the Ordinance, 1979, or any other law of the land, the act of watching such a movie is not a crime, the interim bail has already been granted to the accused applicant, es
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Talamba lawyer
