Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL KARIM versus S.H.O P.S. MITHIANI


Article 561A of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 7/61 / Section 34 of the High Court's hereditary jurisdiction under a record indicates that three accused were involved in the incident, but they were shown as unknown persons. Because it happened at night. The accused were not given in the FIR: The High Court accepted and imposed the constitutional petition challenging the order of detention of any of the accused under the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960. Was deposed and Datino was released. The statement made in the custody to the jail and police complainant stated that his further statement was not recorded by the police and since the incident occurred at night he did not identify any attacker. And confused him by saying that he was not actually one of the assailants' High Court, using his inherent jurisdiction under Section 6161 AA, the CCPC granted the defendant an interim bail in the circumstances. Admitted to entering [B ail]

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.