Find a Lawyer

ABDUL KARIM versus S.H.O P.S. MITHIANI

Article 561A of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 7/61 / Section 34 of the High Court's hereditary jurisdiction under a record indicates that three accused were involved in the incident, but they were shown as unknown persons. Because it happened at night. The accused were not given in the FIR: The High Court accepted and imposed the constitutional petition challenging the order of detention of any of the accused under the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960. Was deposed and Datino was released. The statement made in the custody to the jail and police complainant stated that his further statement was not recorded by the police and since the incident occurred at night he did not identify any attacker. And confused him by saying that he was not actually one of the assailants' High Court, using his inherent jurisdiction under Section 6161 AA, the CCPC granted the defendant an interim bail in the circumstances. Admitted to entering [B ail] property advocate from Wazirabad lawyer