MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus MESSRS AEG PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED
Appellant claiming to have a Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section O12 (3) security guard record, showed that the security guard's job was on behalf of the employer through the contractor. No letter was being submitted by the appellant that he was an employer and failed to establish his case, the appellant was placed on duty by the contractor, the appellant was not entitled to such relief. Due to which, the Labor Court rejected interference with the order to terminate appellant's service.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Loralai lawyer